Racial Hypersensitivty

When in High School, after the civil rights legislation was promulgated, coaches and history teachers all resorted to a stock speech along the lines of "I don't care if you are white, black, yellow, red, green purple (always purple), it's not your color it's the content of your character."

And in so doing, "color" was always highlighted.  Rules reveal our weaknesses, and to keep stressing that something does not matter is to reiterate it matters very much.

Color does matter very much, to the State.  The State wants to know your race, because states must exercise divide and conquer, and by keeping tabs on condition of any race is to maintain the proper divisions for the desired outcome.

The desired outcome is grounded in the teachings of Malthus and Darwin.  Malthus taught population will outstrip supply, leading to starvation, and Darwin taught that minorities were inevitably heading to extermination (Darwin's word).  So give the problem, and the inevitable solution, the ubermensch can help the process along to its natural conclusion.

Now Hitler and others rather wrecked the plain narrative, so a cover story is now in place, "climate change."  Same goals, new cover.  Two things you cannot get out of school in USA without, and that is being grounded in Malthusianism and Darwinism.  Get that down or no GED.

Two landmark events in USA are Brown v Board of Education and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  In both education and civil rights, the conditions of most people of some African heritage has greatly deteriorated in USA.  Leftists bristle at this, but one need only go down the carefully enumerated statistics and see it is true.  Mission proceeding as planned.

There is above the line and below the line.  No judging a man for wanting to be above the line, if he can, but there is an alternative: no line.

I diasgree with this fellow:



I understand her completely.  The penny dropped during the lecture.  Her responsibility is to die, in a system designed for her to fail:


If we truly do not want race to matter, then stop counting it, measuring it.  And stop making self-actualization unlikely for some "colors."

Feel Free To Email This To Three Friends.

Conscientious Objection to Darwinism

Gary North puts it in perspective....

They come in the name of neutral science. Science is never neutral. They come in the name of neutral education. Education is never neutral. They come in the name of neutral civil government. Civil government is never neutral.

Then they escalate their claims. Ever since 1981, it has been illegal for any tax-funded school to teach creationism. This has been extended to intelligent design. So, the Darwinists have used coercion layered on coercion to promote their viewpoint.

The civil authorities make education compulsory: coercion. Then they tax all groups to pay for the schools: coercion. Then they subsidize specific groups' agendas: coercion. Then they ban rival views: coercion. All this is done in the same of science.

Feel Free To Email This To Three Friends.

Crack Is A CIA Money Maker/ Public Policy Initiative

Feel Free To Email This To Three Friends.

No One Went to Prison, Because No One Objected

A community college teachers has tracked down documentation demonstrating chemical tests performed on the poor and minorities around the USA.

'US Radium had this reputation where they had been found legally liable for producing a radioactive powdered paint that killed many young women who painted fluorescent watch tiles,' said Professor Martino-Taylor. 

In her findings, one of the compounds that was sprayed upon the public was called 'FP2266', according to the army's documents, and was manufactured by US Radium. The compound, also known as Radium 226, was the same one that killed and sickened many of the US Radium workers.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2210415/Revealed-Army-scientists-secretly-sprayed-St-Louis-radioactive-particles-YEARS-test-chemical-warfare-technology.html#ixzz27zrYfT6r
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Why not?  At this time they were conducting the Tuskegee Experiments?  And Darwin, taught in every college, teaches that minorities are scheduled for extermination anyway.  Why not use them as lab rats?

This is odious, but it will not stop until somewhere, above the level of community college instructor, people object.  No one has objected, no one has gone to prison.  It is a question of decency, common decency, missing in those who hold official titles in USA.  

Darwin and Killing

A internet sensation is a young woman of African descent who goes off in a class teaching Darwinism.  Although in her anger she makes no clear case, it is no secret that Darwinism is raw racism.  There are many versions of Darwinism, but later in his career,  Darwin emphasized

This is often explained away as being misunderstood, or boys will be boys, or Darwin being a creature of his times.

Charles Darwin (1871) The Descent of Man, 1st edition, pages 168 -169:

The great break in the organic chain between man and his nearest allies, which cannot be bridged over by any extinct or living species, has often been advanced as a grave objection to the belief that man is descended from some lower form; but this objection will not appear of much weight to those who, from general reasons, believe in the general principle of evolution. Breaks often occur in all parts of the series, some being wide, sharp and defined, others less so in various degrees; as between the orang and its nearest allies—between the Tarsius and the other Lemuridae between the elephant, and in a more striking manner between the Ornithorhynchus or Echidna, and all other mammals. But these breaks depend merely on the number of related forms which have become extinct. At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.

Here is how the wikipedia entry tries to explain it away...

According to talk.origins, this is a common creationist quote mine.  

Noncreationists find this passage racist too, but do you notice the slight of hand: the wikipedia essayist argues in essence “ignorant people find this passage objectionable.  If you do, you join the ignorant.”

When Darwin referred to "race" he meant "varieties," not human races.(For example, in Chapter 1 of On the Origin of Species, Darwin writes "the several races, for instance, of the cabbage".) In the passage "there is nothing in Darwin's words to support (and much in his life to contradict) any claim that Darwin wanted the "lower" or "savage races" to be exterminated. He was merely noting what appeared to him to be factual, based in no small part on the evidence of a European binge of imperialism and colonial conquest during his lifetime."

Wow.  In the quote of Darwin above, he is speaking of savage races, not savage cabbages.  he does mention in his list to make his case lmurs, but moved up the food chain in this quote to specifically mention man.  There is no way to argue out of the position Darwin takes above: The civilized will extermintate the savags, and the savages are blacks.

Few people acrually read Darwin, but apparently this young woman did.  She no longer cared for an education, if it is designed to inculcate that people of her race are to be exterminated.